Huawei, a large Chinese technology company on the cusp, once again released negative signals to the outside world.
Xu Zhijun, Huawei's rotating CEO, said at the Huawei Global Analyst Conference on the 17th that although 5G technology is faster and more reliable, consumers will not find "substantial differences between 5G and 4G technologies."
5G technology has always been seen as a necessary condition for the era of autonomous driving and the interconnection devices that make up the Internet of Things. But Xu Zhijun said, "Even in the moment, we also have the technology to support autonomous driving."
According to the Financial Times, in fact, telecom operators and equipment manufacturers have long been pessimistic about the field.
Canals analyst Ben Stanton said: "Behind the scenes, the mobile industry's pessimism about 5G technology continues to ferment, but Huawei is the first large infrastructure company to say this... The reality is that 5G The deployment of technology will be extremely expensive for operators, requiring tens of thousands of new base stations in each country, and the industry has not found killer use cases for 5G networks.
However, Xu Zhijun also said at the conference that Huawei will continue to invest in 5G. The logic behind this is "If you are not good at 5G, then users will not even buy your 4G."
Earlier, US President Trump came forward directly to stop Broadcom's acquisition of Qualcomm's deal. According to "Wall Street Journal" and other US media reports, Trump made the decision to the core is to avoid Huawei and other Chinese 5G technology leaders in the technology. On the United States to achieve catch-up.
Huawei released the 5G commercial chip Barong 5G01 on the eve of the World Mobile Communications Conference in February this year.
After ZTE was ordered by the US government to purchase Qualcomm chips for seven years, Huawei also reported bad news.
According to Observer Online, Huawei fired five US employees last week, including the US government's chief liaison officer, William Plummer. It is speculated that this is the United States to focus on ZTE and then stared at another Chinese technology giant, but Huawei responded that it is only a normal business adjustment.
In the 18th article, The New York Times directly stated that "Huawei suffered a big defeat in the US market and released a signal to change its strategy."
The New York Times said that in the future planning of Huawei, the US market will no longer appear. The signal from Huawei’s US layoffs is that it will end its decade-long efforts for the US market and withdraw its return to the US market. The layout, abandoning the relationship in the US political arena, to avoid the US government's allegations of "close contact with the Chinese government."
The New York Times also said that Huawei's strategy is changing because of its huge changes in its business prospects in the United States. On Tuesday (17th), the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted on a new rule that could easily destroy Huawei's "small business" that has been worked hard in the United States over the years.
Although the rule does not directly mention Huawei’s name, its content on “prohibiting US telecommunications operators subsidized by the US government to cooperate with suppliers listed by the US government as a threat to national security†is clearly aimed at Huawei.
In February of this year, six senior US intelligence agencies called on Americans not to use Huawei products or services.
In addition, the New York Times also said that Huawei is a victim of Sino-US high-tech exchanges, and the company's recent moves also indicate that it has accepted the defeat of the US government.
Recently, Huawei’s communication with the US government has decreased significantly. An example of this is that in January of this year, after discovering that there were security breaches in all computer microprocessors that almost Huawei exported, a US Senate sent a letter to Huawei, but Huawei decided not to respond.
At the Huawei Global Developers Conference held on the 17th, Xu Zhijun said, "In some things, our wishes cannot change their minds... Some things, you let it go like this, but it will be more reassuring."
In the New York Times, the US's toughness against ZTE and Huawei shows what the US government can do to curb the influence of China's cutting-edge technology in the world.
In addition, the New York Times also sorted out the troubles that these years have encountered in the United States.
Since 2012, Huawei's troubles in the United States have been increasing. At that time, the report of the meeting issued a warning that Huawei's equipment may be used by the Chinese government to monitor the Americans or undermine the security and stability of the US telecommunications network. This year, Huawei spent $1.2 million to lobby the US Congress. Last year, Huawei’s spending was only $60,000.
Large telecom operators in the United States are also deliberately avoiding cooperation with Huawei, such as Verizon and AT&T. At present, Huawei is the world's third-largest smartphone brand. When AT&T withdraws its cooperation intention with Huawei, Huawei's business in the US has begun to shrink.
Utrecht
According to Observer's previous report, the US Trade Representative Office (USTR) is considering new allegations against China to retaliate against China's restrictions on US technology companies operating in China. For example, Alibaba is prohibited from providing cloud computing services in the United States, or restricting the expansion of the company in the United States.
In addition, the White House is still trying to make another accusation against China under Section 301. The US is expected to issue a new tax list for the “China’s infringement of US intellectual property rightsâ€.
Recently, the United States has frequently provoked China on trade issues.
On March 22, US President Trump signed a memorandum instructing to impose a 25% tariff on Chinese exports to the United States based on the results of the “301 Investigationâ€.
On April 3, the US Department of Commerce announced the list of Chinese goods to be subject to tariffs, with a total of more than 1,300 items and a value of over 50 billion.
As for the US ban on ZTE, a spokesperson of the Ministry of Commerce said that it hopes that the US will properly handle the law and create a fair, fair and stable legal and policy environment for the enterprise; China has always required Chinese companies to comply with the overseas business process. The host country’s legal policies and legal compliance operations; ZTE Corporation has conducted extensive trade and investment cooperation with hundreds of American companies, contributing tens of thousands of jobs to the United States.
For Sino-US trade frictions, Vice Minister of Commerce Wang Shouwen said: Many industries in the United States have strong competitiveness, but the government does not allow it to export, and it does not sell to China. Of course, there will be a deficit and there will be a deficit.
Fuel Filter For MITSUBISHI
Mitsubishi Fuel Filter,Mitsubishi Auto Fuel Filter,Mitsubishi Automobile Fuel Filter,Mitsubishi Car Fuel Filter
Zhoushan Shenying Filter Manufacture Co., Ltd. , https://www.renkenfilter.com